VINTOLOGI

New thread http://vintologi.clanz.co/topic1.html

How do you know if something is true?

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:18 pm

Humans dislike uncertainty and often convinces themselves of some beliefs in the absence of evidence. Most people lacks the intelligence to detect logical flaws in lies but if you do have that ability it will be much easier to know if something is true and not.

Differentiating true from false is more about intelligence than data today, in most cases you have all information you need to draw the correct conclusion but often you fail due to lack of intelligence or will. We currently does not understand the true laws of physics but we have still discovered how nature works in general.

Vintologi is build upon a few assumptions that can be proven or dis-proven, for that need more powerful brains, not more fancy experiments. A true fundamental theory of physics shouldn't have any dimensionless constants(such as mass ration) that cannot be derived from the theory, if you need fudge factors your theory is fundamentally wrong.

I do not have to prove that the consciousness is eternal, i simply assume it's true since i do not view the alternative as reasonable.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

What is the soul?

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:27 pm

Soul is just your free will, the unpredictable part of you. Determinism is already debunked by quantum mechanics. Your soul is real 1 2 3 4

The soul has no gender, race or specie but with time you get used to your body which results in you most likely ending up in something similar the next life. Your soul can only escape the body when your brain stops working.

The quantum randomness observed in experiments just represent choices different souls make, we do not know how many souls their is at least one and not infinite many. The amount of conscious experiences determines how conscious something is, an insect will be less conscious than a human. Your soul is simply the sequence of quantum mechanical choices you do. The sequence is infinite while the number of times you live as a human on earth is finite.

Are all souls equal?
Obviously an insect does not have the same form of counsciousness as a human, the souls can differ in two ways.
1. we intelligent humans have a bigger part of god withn us(a million times bigger).
2. the consciouss experience when living as an insect is percieved to be much shorter meaning living 1 years as an insect is equivalent as living 25 seconds as a human.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

What is a religion?

PostPosted by datorissten » Mon Aug 29, 2016 10:38 am

You do not have to offer any proof that a religion is true. A religion is either not sufficiently proven to be regarded as science(such as believing that unicorns exist somewhere) or it is a fairy tail already disproved using the scientific method. It is natural for people to make up something when they don't know for sure, we come up with some explanation and convince our selves that the explanation is true.

There is currently 4000 gods different peoples have believed in that we know of http://www.godchecker.com/

Science has revealed that a religious group is more stable than a non religious group, when you have something in common to believe in you are more likely to stick together and help each other out. A religion can be political or spiritual, in modern societies religious superstition has been replaced by political superstition such as statism.

Of course a religion should have bible, here is one for vintologi https://www.docdroid.net/63a1miX/vintologi1.odt.html
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

one dollar one vote

PostPosted by datorissten » Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:07 pm

Bribes and lobbying makes a country less democratic since it makes it possible to buy legislation, but is it really a bad thing that legislation can be bought?

If you believe in anarcho-capitalism you believe in privatization of everything including the 'justice' system. The NRA has allowed Americans to keep their guns and welfare companies in several countries has lobbied successfully to allow for private welfare and hence more freedom to the population.

Lobbying is actually one of the reason democracy hasn't lead to total disaster, the market will be able to prevent insane legislation by lobbying. Nothing prevents ordinary citizens from organizing in lobby groups similar to NRA, it is the only peaceful and realistic way to change how the country work, just voting or signing petitions is of course useless.

Recently due to decentralized currencies it is now possible for ordinary citizens to raise money against a politician they dislike(assassination or finding skeletons in the closet). We are now fighting a propaganda war and the losers will be ordinary citizens.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

what is "good genes" ?

PostPosted by datorissten » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:37 pm

Which types of genes/species that survive is determined by the environment, an advantageous trait in one environment might be disadvantageous in a different environment. Currently which genes that is likely to survive is determined by human action.

If females prefer a certain male trait that trait is likely to be more common simply due to female preference, it does not have do be advantageous for survival. Humans have genetic preferences and these preferences is similar for most humans(all races):
Image
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

About pain and suffering

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:56 pm

Do we really want to live in a world when no one experience pain or any other kind of suffering?
Image
Suffering and pain is a natural part of your lives, it allows to to experience reality the fullest. We go out of our way to avoid hurt, dodge danger and prevent hardships. Yet, it is the triumph over frailties or challenges that define us as strong, resilient, mature and experienced.

Contrary to popular belief, it appears a little suffering may be good for us. It forces us to solve problems creatively, think differently and explore our own vulnerabilities. What if Bill Gates gave up when his first business failed? What if Rosa Parks had chosen a different seat? What if Bethany Hamilton stopped surfing after she lost her arm in a shark attack?

Jungian James Hollis called suffering a prerequisite for maturation. He says, without it, we have no hope but to stay “unconscious, infantile and dependent.”

Researchers have found that life problems force us to think differently and stay intellectually nimble. Finding a new route when a subway line is down, climbing out from under a mountain of debt, figuring out how to get over an ex — all of these little puzzles are miniature mental marathons.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

About taxation

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:24 pm

Taxation is just master another word for robbery, the state uses violence and threats of violence to extort money from the stupid masses. Many people currently believe the lies that taxation is needed for a functional society but this is a pure lie, you do not need taxes at all. Slavery wasn't abolished, it was only replaced with slavery which makes a lot more economic sense. In many countries more than half out what you earn will be lost due to all taxes.

If more people has followed "do not get stolen from" instead of "you shall not steal" morality it would be a lot more difficult for governments to steal money. A population generally get the taxes they deserve, if you do not stand up for your rights you will lose them. The us constitution forbids taxation but that didn't prevent the united states to introduce massive federal taxation(theft), a piece of paper will not make a country free.

When you are taking someones money with force you will be able to a larger extent satisfy your preferences and the individual you steal from will be able to satisfy his/her preferences to a lesser extent. With government controlled money a lot of resources is also stolen via inflation, it is common for governments to lone money from their own central bank(directly and indirectly).

Not many people would be willing to finance a foreign war on a country that doesn't pose a threat to them, with taxation(hidden and direct) it is possible for government to engage in wars the population does not want.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

The need to be dominated by a master

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:51 pm

Most people do not want true freedom. They want a master to be happy and being able to chose one is enough for most people. Why is it common that workplaces don't allow any freedom for employees? for the simple reason that most people(especially woman) does not want freedom. In a free market it is possible for most people to bee truly free if they want, but most people will be happy to sell their labour and often even their bodies for money.

the 'liberation' of woman has only resulted in the state having a lot more power and ordinary males having a lot less freedom, females have not gain any real freedom. During the viking age females was able to get married at the age of 12 but currently the state denies them that freedom(the male would most likely be jailed). Females rarely want freedom, when the were 'liberated' the imminently voted for extreme socialism and tyranny, they want do be dominated and humiliated.

It is common for people to admire authoritarian leaders such as Hitler or Lincoln. Unlike business leader a leader for the country is forced upon everybody, not doing what the state wants you to can often pose a danger to your health. Most people that has been murdered in the history has been murdered by their own government 1 2 3 4
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Capitalism

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:41 pm

Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Characteristics central to capitalism include private property, capital accumulation, wage labor, voluntary exchange, a price system, self ownership and competitive markets.

When the government regulates a business they prevent people from making choices, such as working on a job that has harsh working conditions or taking a low wage job. Should the state really protect people from their own 'stupidity' ? should we prevent people from taking harsh/dangerous high paying job over safe and easy low paying jobs?

One common claim is that the free market result in centralisation, is this true and would it be bad? it is true that big corporations has a dominating role in the current society and this is party due do government involvement, big companies will benefit from the low interest and high inflation created by the central bank. Big companies will also be able to better adapt to regulation, immaterial property and taxation laws.

Monopolies due to the free market is rare, one company might end up having a dominated role but it is only by offering very good products. Most monopolies is granted by the government 1 2
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Rules i like

PostPosted by datorissten » Sun Sep 04, 2016 3:35 pm

0: don't mutilate your children, circumcision(male genital mutilation) is strictly forbidden.
1: have vaginal sex.
2: have anal sex.
3: do not use any contraceptives unless you have poor genes.
4: protect your dignity, do not turn the other cheek.
5: if you are a female; try having natural births.
6: If you are male; become/remain strong and fit.
7: Live healthy, do not drink beer, don't be fat.
8: if you have good genes; try having many biological children where the other parent also have good genes.
9: hate your enemies.
10: females should be raped.
11: despise the weak.
12: do not treat other people as you want to be treated yourself.
13: experience deep-troating(sex).
14: socialists deserve torture.
15: your free will itself is a just cause.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Living as a freedom fighter

PostPosted by datorissten » Mon Sep 05, 2016 5:31 pm

Forget family life, you should not spend too much time witch your wives and children. Living with your children will endanger them and should be avoided, avoiding sex except for reproduction is also a good idea. One possibility is several freedom fighters living together in a community large enough to repel police raids, the police are cowards and this can be used for our advantage.
Image
It is a good idea to stay ghost wolf as a freedom fighter, don't let anyone know your objective or your opinions, not even your wives and children. Don't be a member of any organisation you don't want to hurt, you do not need any leader http://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm

Owning weapons is a legal danger, especially if you are well known by the police, keeping a low profile is a good choice. If you want to tell others what you think use tor and make sure your activities cannot be linked to your, never use your real identity anywhere on the internet.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Polycentric law

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:56 pm

Ultimately what's wright and wrong is determined by battle, most people want to avoid war and hence the people with powerful weapons will be motivated fo cooperate. Power centralisation is very dangerous(hundreds of millions have been killed by their government).

Polycentric law is a legal structure in which providers of legal systems compete or overlap in a given jurisdiction, as opposed to monopolistic statutory law according to which there is a sole provider of law for each jurisdiction. Devolution of this monopoly occurs by the principle of jurisprudence in which they rule according to higher law.

If we manage to crush the current system we will most likely end up with polycentric law. Since your power is related to your violence and terror potential people and groups will be motivated to arm themselves a lot which will solve the issue of national defence.

How long will a system of polycentric law last? It depends on the population, if the population is willing to sacrifice security and simplicity for freedom it is likely to last a long time period. If most people prefer to have a state it will not take long before they got the state they wanted(and high taxes)
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

The futility of limited statepower

PostPosted by datorissten » Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:33 am

A state, in accordance with generally accepted terminology, is defined as a compulsory territorial monopolist of law and order (an ultimate decision maker). Feudal lords and kings did not typically fulfill the requirements of a state; they could only "tax" with the consent of the taxed, and on his own land every free man was as much a sovereign (ultimate decision maker) as the feudal king was on his. However, in the course of many centuries, these originally stateless societies had gradually transformed into absolute – statist – monarchies. While they had initially been acknowledged voluntarily as protectors and judges, European kings had at long last succeeded in establishing themselves as hereditary heads of state. Resisted by the aristocracy but helped along by the "common people," they had become absolute monarchs with the power to tax without consent and to make ultimate decisions regarding the property of free men.

Thanks to the great advances in economic and political theory since the late 1700s, in particular at the hands of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard, we are now able to give a precise answer to this question. According to Mises and Rothbard, once there is no longer free entry into the business of the production of protection and adjudication, the price of protection and justice will rise and their quality will fall. Rather than being a protector and judge, a compulsory monopolist will become a protection racketeer – the destroyer and invader of the people and property that he is supposed to protect, a warmonger, and an imperialist.

Indeed, the inflated price of protection and the perversion of the ancient law by the English king, both of which had led the American colonists to revolt, were the inevitable result of compulsory monopoly. Having successfully seceded and thrown out the British occupiers, it would only have been necessary for the American colonists to let the existing homegrown institutions of self-defence and private (voluntary and cooperative) protection and adjudication by specialized agents and agencies take care of law and order 0

The only real limit of state power is the threat of violent uprising, this can be limited severely by disarming the population, if the population isn't willing and able to fight for freedom the result can be disastrous. Both USSR and china under Mao has constitutions claiming to give rights to the people, history has teaches us over and over again that papers is a useless defence against tyranny.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

About personality

PostPosted by datorissten » Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:46 am

Your personality is simply learned behaviour, your soul does not have a personality or even gender/race. When you repeat a certain behaviour with success(such as talking for an audience) it will become natural for you. How people behave change a lot with time, your free will, genetics and environment determines your personality.

Breivik went from being a geek to a mass murderer and hero. You can also change to the better, in line with who you actually wants to be). Ultimately it is you that decide which type of person you want to be, changing can be difficult but with time the new personality will become natural.

Many people today claim that "you should be yourself" and also have detailed standards for acceptable and unacceptable behaviours, this is not a contradiction if you have been shaped by our current societal standards. Our current society has many standards of good and bad that is imposed on us from early age, this is called upbringing or nurture and consists of pollution the brains of young people. What people call immaturity is simply people not yet having conformed to all the standards our society tries to impose upon us. What we have today is conflicting standards which creates confusion and also more real freedom.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Being a lone wolf

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:28 am

In life you will have to make a very difficult decision, remain a part of the masses or cut all ties to the typical people. In order to become truly successful you have to cut all ties with ordinary people and be very selective with your friends, maybe you will have to live your life knowing you have no real friends and no-one that you can truly rely on in difficult situations.

When you are a superior human it is not you that need others, it is others that need you. When you belong to the smartest 1% you will learn the hard way that you should ignore most people and only listen to a few, even if it is a few that tells you stuff you do not agree with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMFc7agO09w

Did you know 91% of all traders lose money? in order to be truly successful in trading you have to do things differently such as trading against a trend or buying during panic. I once missed a great buying opportunity(xmr, monero) due to trusting a person i shouldn't have trusted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHWuOTKF2Zo
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

hate & love

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:14 am

There is a lot of talk about hate-crimes, there is a body of laws against hate-crimes, everybody seams to be worried about hate. Hate appears to be the gravest problem of our time but hate is good, hate gives structure to our lives, it gives us a reason to exist, a focus, something to strive for, an identity. Hate allows us to see through lies and pretence, it helps us concentrate on the essential. Hate is democratic; the rich and powerful cannot hate more than their slaves/subjects and soon hate might be all that we have left.

Hate emancipates, without hate for slavery you cannot break your shackles, without hate for injustice their can be no justice. The greatest achievements of humans has grown from hate and the ability to control hate. Hate separates the humans from other animals, animals do not hate but humans do. Humans can hate for decades, sometimes for an entire life, we can even pass on hate to our children and grandchildren and keep hate alive for centuries. Hate is a sign of abstract intellect; only humans can hate people they have never seen or met, only humans can hate concepts and processes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll8quOF-9ZI

How can we know what love is if we refuse to recognise and understand hate? love and hate are the two opposite sides of the same coin. In order to be complete we need hate, only fools talk endlessly about hate but forget the hate. Hate separate us from the weak and docile masses.

Do not fear hate, do not deny or reject hate, accept hate and embrace hate, learn to know it and learn to use it. Hate is your most powerful weapon, a hidden source of your strength, do not deny it for you. What the current false elite fears most in this world is our ability to hate because our hate will one day our hate will be the most revolutionary force on the planet, our hate will destroy and create empires.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

The neanderthals

PostPosted by datorissten » Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:50 am

Danny Vendramini has come to the conclusion that the neanderthals where not at all like us, instead he believed the neanderthals were super predators that hunted homo sapiens for sex and meat 0 1 2 3 after doing some research i am now sure most of what he states is wrong.

According to the study conducted by Svante Pääbo Europeans and Asians have 1...4% neanderthal dna while Africans lacks neanderthal dna, i personally suspect the real number is much higher
Varg Vikernes wrote:the samples Svante had were not Neanderthals to begin with, but mixed Neanderthal-Denisovans... and we don't even know how how much Neanderthal and how much Denisovans were in them. For all we know, they were 1/8 Neanderthal, and 7/8 Denisovans.


It turnes out neanderthals had light skin and eyes, Physical traits from the neanderthals is common among whites 5 6

Peaceful or not the interaction with neanderthals improved the Caucasians gene pool a lot, the losers were the neanderthals that went extinct due to all the admixing. It is likely that a hybrid vigor was created that was superior to both neanderthals and pure homo sapiens in that particular environment, the neanderthals had large bodies and brains that needed a lot of calories.

Michael Bradley has suggested that Jews have a lot more neanderthal dna which results in them being aggressive against more pure homo sapiens. I managed to find an interesting article where it states that Semites have 10...20% neanderthal dna but it refers to a study that no longer exist online. To me it is obvious the scientist are afraid of going to the bottom of these race questions, we will have to do research of our own as best we can.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

healthy living

PostPosted by datorissten » Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:29 pm

A lot of people want to live healthy but are confused, a diet promoted as healthy might actually be very bad for you. In order to get an idea what is good for you you have to look at what humans have eaten during the last in the past, what food we have evolved to live well on.
Image
The grain and legume-based diet was originally only intended for slaves in the ancient Middle East and North Africa. It was a way to get a lot of calories in them, so they could work long and hard and not faint from hunger. The upper classes continued to eat a paleolithic diet.

Ever wondered why the grain-heavy diet promoted by the government is called a"pyramid diet? It's just like the diet given to slaves who built the pyramid. we should adopt a paleolithic diet and stop eating the slave diet.

It is not healthy to only eat food from plants 0 1 you also need meat 2 3 4 5
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Saying no to contraceptives

PostPosted by datorissten » Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:58 pm

If you are not willing to have children with an individual you should not have sex in the first place, never humiliate yourself by having so called “protected sex”, if you are male you should never ever put a condom on your penis. Alex and oral sex is fine alternatives if you are not currently interested in having children. If you are male you should not care about unwanted/unplanned pregnancies, sire it can end up costing you money but that is no big issue, if you are intelligent making money should not be too difficult and there is currently the option of abusing government welfare.

Birth control pills is very harmful towards females and if you are female you should never take them for many reasons. If you are a female you should be selective and only have sex with the best among the males, the losers most be rejected.

If you are smart enough to realize you do have some poor genetics you should probably still have children since most stupid people are unable to accept their own inferiority, thus you should always have as many children as possible and let the weak ones die when the society collapses.

from http://docdro.id/63a1miX
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

having fun as an abusive ruler

PostPosted by datorissten » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:43 pm

Sure being a tyrant oppressing people can be fun but getting a position of real power can be very difficult and your power is often limited, in most of your lives you will be the one oppressed with a monarchy, democracy or other forms of system where a large amount of people are governed by a single state.

The state is just people using violence to enforce their will and it is mostly boring today, my proposal is to instead of large states have smaller entities such as polygamous families where the husband can abuse his wives, maybe bring back gladiator games where we can have some fun watching people get eaten by lions.

You might thing there exist ways to rule a country that isn't abusive, well we do not want the horrors of democracy, elite rule could work but i have not yet come up with a good system for it, here is some of my ideas 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 suggestion6 may work but i doubt it.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Religion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron