VINTOLOGI

New thread http://vintologi.clanz.co/topic1.html

VINTOLOGI

PostPosted by datorissten » Tue Jul 12, 2016 12:58 pm

VintologI is a religion build upon the following 4 axioms

0: Consciousness has no first beginning or final end.

1: The probability for reincarnation decreases with genetic distance.

2: Consciousness is a fundamental property of nature which manifests it self by the collapse of the wavefunction.

3: God emerges when the quantum mechanical system becomes larger.

A new view of god
The ultimate god is something having unlimited intelligence and power which is impossible it is however possible to archive higher and higher intelligence by breeding, intelligence is also a source for power. The most intelligent and knowledgeable among us can hence be viewed as gods which shows the path to the future.

No absolute morality
It is up to each human too impose their morals upon others using their might, good and bad is just personal preferences. Human life itself has no intrinsic value, after death there will simply be a reincarnation time period and after that a new life will start.

Your actions do have consequences, not just for this life but also for future lives, it is up to you to determine if you like the consequences or not. Since no absolute morality exist karma cannot exist either.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Quantum consciousness

PostPosted by datorissten » Tue Jul 12, 2016 4:11 pm

Quantum mechanics is the only viable explanation for consciousness 0 1 2 3 in the 1990s Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff started to develop their "orch or" theory for consciousness. Roger Penrose has suggested that the collapse of the wave function(quantum mechanics) occurs of it self after a time depending on how large the separation in space-time is. Roger Penrose's interpretation of quantum mechanics makes a lot more sense than the Copenhagen interpretation and this could actually be tested by some experiments in the future.
Image
According to the orch or theory the wavefunction simply describes a separation in spacetime, large separation will result in faster collapse due to gravity(general relativity). The collapse of the wavefunction is non-computational and hence makes consciousness possible. Hence a larger quantum mechanical system will offer faster self collapse and faster computations. Consciousness is a fundamental property of nature and not an emergent property, you cannot create consciousness from classical computations.

Recently a molecule that makes quantum entanglement in the brain possible was discovered http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05929

It is not possible to create consciousness from classical computations. Quantum information cannot be destroyed or copied, only transferred. When you die the quantum information of your consciousness will remain in the universe and reincarnation will become possible.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Why polygamy is good

PostPosted by datorissten » Tue Jul 12, 2016 8:42 pm

Without enforced monogamy the most successful/attractive males will have multiple wives, this will lead to a lot harder competition for females and a less stable society, which is a good thing. A less stable society will be needed for racial improvements and hence stability isn't desirable. With shortage of females the men will be needed to take larger risks and the stupid cowards will be eliminated from the gene pool.
Image

The disadvantage with polygamy is that it decreases the evolutionary pressure on females due to the shortage of them, there exist no humane solutions for this but one inhumane solution is to draft stupid stupid/ugly females to dangerous wars, this is the real advantage with female draft. Even with female shortage a lot of low value females will prove themselves out of the sexual market and not get any children, their lack of self awareness will lead to an evolutionary failure.

Without Polygamy it will only be possible for a man to impregnate a female once a year which isn't desirable. The best example of Polygamy is Charles Lindbergh. Polygamy will also make it possible for a female to find begin a relationship with a more attractive male(all females will benefit from it due to less completion for good males).

The emotional aspect
It is a matter of preference if you prefer to have a monogamous relationship or several partners. The emotional benefit for the male with more than one wife is that it will be emotionally easier for him if a wife divorce him(more than 50% of marriages end up in divorce) since he will be less emotionally attached to each woman. The females will get the emotional benefit of being with a very good man and a lot of females prefer sharing a good man over being alone with an unattractive man.

The media wants us to believe that humans are naturally monogamous. We are not. Men have always been intended to be polygamist, while women are what their men make them, which is monogamous. The basic concept of marriage is that the man invests in the family in return for the sexual fidelity of his wife. This way, the man can invest in kids who he knows are his. It is well known that women prefer men who are successful with other women. The evolutionary benefits are obvious. A man who has the opportunity to spread his genes to many women will probably produce sons with the same opportunity, thereby also spreading the mother's genes. This would indicate that women would actually prefer to marry men who can have sex with other women.

So why do western women insist on the opposite? western women do not want a good man. They are taught that they should dominate and control their men, a position which women were never intended to fill. If the husband agrees and commits to sexual fidelity, then he has shown that he is weak and has failed the test. By committing to sexual fidelity, he is showing that he has no backbone and will give in to his wife on all issues. If his wife believes her husband's commitment, she will view him as a doormat and will soon find him boring and lose interest in having sex with him. If she doesn't believe his commitment, she will consider him a lying bastard and the marriage will be full of drama until it finally falls apart. Either way, the husbands loses. By refusing to commit to sexual fidelity, the husband passes the shit test. The wife will then feel that she still needs to compete with other women to hold on to her husband, so she will continue to be sexually attracted to him.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_an ... gies_.html

Alpha fucks, beta bucks
One clever strategy for a female is to use one as provider and another man as fucker/sperm donor), she will then get the best of both world. With the current laws the paternity will go to the husband and not the biological father, he will most likely end up paying child support for a child that isn't his.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Might is Right

PostPosted by datorissten » Wed Jul 13, 2016 10:51 am

How do you determine which preferences that will be satisfied when there is no absolute morality? well it is pretty simple 0 1 2

Image
with brute force(extreme violence) and propaganda you will be able to impose your preferences upon others, might is right.

While ordinary citizens get imprisoned for murder, robbery and theft the rulers can do the same crimes in massive numbers without any consequences. By having superior might you can enforce any morals into the masses and they will happily accept them no matter how obvious the contradictions are. Popular lies have ever been the most potent enemies of personal liberty.

Only slaves is born into contracts, the most important freedom is the freedom to dominate the weaklings, Survivor of the fittest is the law of this world. An inherently strong person becomes weak and destructive by following false morals and reason. It is not possible to gain true power without using methods currently viewed as unethical. Christianity is a religion for slaves.

Death and destruction are necessary to the health of the world, and therefore as natural, and lovable, as birth and life. Only priests and born cowards moan and weep over dying. Brave men face it with approving nonchalance.

Laws and rules imposed on you, from days of old renown, are not intended for your “good” but for your crushing down. Then dare to rend the chains that bind, and to yourself be true. Dare to liberate your mind, from all things, old and new.

Equality can only exist between equals. Civilization implies division of labor, division of labor implies subordination and subordination implies injustice and inequality. Government is founded on property. Property is founded on conquest. Conquest is founded on power. All power is founded on brain and brawn.

The rules of life are not to be found in Korans, Bibles, Decalogues and Constitutions, but rather the rules of decadence and death. The “law of laws” is not written in Hebrew consonants or upon tables of brass and stone, but in every man’s own heart. He who obeys any standard of right and wrong, but the one set up by his own conscience, betrays himself into the hands of his enemies, who are ever laying in wait to bind him to their millstones. And generally a man’s most dangerous enemies are his neighbors.

The lie that is known to be a lie is half eradicated, but the lie that even intelligent persons regard as a sacred fact – the lie that has been inculcated around a mother’s knee – is more dangerous to contend against than a creeping pestilence.

The natural world is a world of war; the natural man is a warrior; the natural law is tooth and claw. All else is error. A condition of combat everywhere exists. We are born into perpetual conflict. It is our inheritance, even as it was the heritage of previous generations. Superiority and inferiority can only be decided by battle.

Take from the peasantry even an infinitesimal proportion of their petty property, and they will lynch you as a lazy thievish tramp; but two-thirds of their harvests by law and rule (tax) and they will turn out in the middle of the night, to cheer you in your steam-horsed palace car, as it whirls through their ‘God forsaken’ villages.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Proving reincarnation

PostPosted by datorissten » Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:00 pm

There exist several convincing cases about children having memories from past life's but past life memories can never prove and disprove reincarnation. You can however test the validity of past life memories by comparing 100 children that claims to remember past lives with 100 children who just makes the story up after being told so but past life memories and reincarnation is not the same thing. The work by Ian Stevenson is not scientific. We need a theoretical proof:

P(i) = probability for reincarnation to unconscious brain i after death(assuming you did not yet reincarnate).

Σ P(i) = ∞

If you just look at the earth the sum will be finite, the sun will eventually burn out and all life will die. In order for the sum to be finite(resulting in probability 1) intelligent life will need to be developed infinite many times, for this to be the case the current cosmological model must be incorrect.

For a human brain i of the same race P(i) is likely to be between 10^-9 and 10^-6.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Abortions and murder

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 15, 2016 12:01 pm

There is nothing inherently wrong with murder, it does not matter if consciousness has developed or not. It is currently unknown when consciousness is developed in a child/fetus and it does not matter, if consciousness is developed in the fetus it will simply reincarnate after the abortion.

There is nothing wrong in murdering defective children, it is however a sin to kill a fetus that has good genes and health, even if the fetus is unconscious. Even a child with average genes might turn out to be valuable.

It is better to die with honour than to end up having a miserable life. The ones killed by Breivik were lucky, they most likely lost the tragic memories and brain pollution and reincarnated, the survivors had to live with their memories and grief over lost friends.

Generally death sentence isn't a 'good' sentence, the executed will simply reincarnate while relatives will suffer from grief. Murder is however an effective form of punishment since most people today fear death and grief will be inflicted upon their friends and family.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

The fear of death is a threat to liberty

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:34 pm

A person afraid of dying is easy to control, a coward is simply someone afraid of dying. Christianity and odinism has offered a false sense of security for the masses, if someone believes he will come to valhalla after dying in battle he will be more likely to be brave. In reality you do not know how your next life will be, you might end up living as the opposite gender of even on another planet.

A person that doesn't fear death is a lot more difficult to enslave https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A he will protect his family without hesitation and be a dangerous warrior. If you accept vintologi you will accept that death isn't the end, you will simply reincarnate and be reborn. It is better to live a short honorable life than to live a long life in a cage, what matters is the quality of your life and how it affects your future lives, not how long it is.

Image
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

The importance of race

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:45 pm

Your soul no gender gender or race but you will with time get used to your body(mostly the brain) and be be likely to end up with something similar the next life, the probability for reincarnation decreases with genetic distance. If the population of a race increases the probability to reincarnate into the race will be come larger and the probability to reincarnate from the race to another one will become smaller. If a race become extinct the souls will most likely reincarnate into different human races.

In nature there is competition among races which drives weaker races to extinction. For most animals strength is mostly genetic but humans are an exception. The Caucasoid race is genetically stronger than all other races but our values make us weak, this will change if our religious/philosophical views change in favor of racial survival and advancements.

Image
There is a huge difference between different human races. One obvious difference is the difference in beauty where Caucasoid is generally(by all races) is regarded as most beautiful while primitive races is regarded as ugly.
Image
In a future life i would like to live as a beautiful Aryan woman and having many children. Unfortunately currently the Caucasian(white) race is decreasing in numbers while the other races in increasing and this development needs to stop. I want to live among intelligent and beautiful Aryans, not just this life but future lives.

About racemixing
Egalitarians have argued that people of mixed race are in some ways superior to people of unmixed race, and therefore race-mixing is desirable. This seems inconsistent with their position that there are no significant genetic differences between races, but egalitarians are not strongly committed to consistency.

Due to mutation and selection, the longer a population has been isolated from other populations, the more likely it is to have acquired alleles by mutation that other populations don’t have. Intrabreeding passes those alleles around within the population, so that people within that population are more likely to share alleles than are people from different populations , i.e., that population is more homozygous than is a population formed by combining that population with another population.

Now, when two populations interbreed to form a hybrid population, each parent population has accumulated, over tens or hundreds of thousands of years, a unique set of alleles that is close to the optimum for the particular environment it has been in, and that environment includes the environment its own members have created, e.g., their history, culture, and accumulated knowledge. Inevitably, the two parent populations have lived in different environments, and the hybrid population will live in the environment of one or both of the parent populations. Thus, the hybrid population will not have the collection of alleles that are most advantageous for either of those environments, a substantial loss of fitness, i.e., their likelihood of successfully reproducing is lessened.

When man makes a plant or animal hybrid, he carefully selects which offspring he will let survive and reproduce. Nature, too, selects ruthlessly and destroys thousands of crosses from different populations, leaving few, if any, hybrid survivors. (Patterson, 1999, p. 95). When the Caucasians arose, for example, there was no government aid to the less capable, and those who did not possess the most advantageous traits of both the Cro-Magnons and the Neanderthals simply died without issue. The very existence of the Caucasians in Europe proves that they, the hybrids, were more fit in Europe than either the Cro-Magnons or the Neanderthals who begot them.

With miscegenation today, however, few of the hybrids fail to survive and reproduce because food, shelter, medical and dental treatment, and social services are provided for them, whether or not they are sufficiently productive to pay for them. Instead of letting natural selection take its course, as it did when the Caucasian hybrids were born, the state requires the more fit to reduce their own chances of surviving and reproducing in order to enhance the chances of the less fit surviving and reproducing. Any farmer with an ounce of sense knows that all his plants and livestock are not all genetically equal, and so he selects his seed for his next year’s crop from only the best of his plants and animals; only egalitarians tell every seed that with a little manure it can be the equal of any other seed, however unfit it is.
Image
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Freedom vs statism

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 15, 2016 2:20 pm

In a free society you will be able to live your life according to your preference. If you are killed you will simply reincarnate but if you live as a slave you will suffer, for this reason security is a lot more important than freedom. Currently our society isn't free at all, we get imprisoned for breaking laws and many of these crimes lacks victims. A lot of innocent males corrently gets inprisoned for sex crimes(age of concent and rape laws) and a lot of people get their children stolen from them by the state despite being good parents.

With the growth of mass democracy (the abolition of poll taxes and other qualifications for voters, and the enfranchisement of non-Whites), the rise in the influence of the mass media on public opinion, the U.S. government was gradually transformed into the malignant monster it is today. We are now in a society where the government wants to control every aspect of our lives in all developed countries on earth, it is harder and harder to live the live we want to live without getting imprisoned for breaking laws while the government is free to break every law and constitution.

People have different preferences and we will never be able to make everybody happy. We can however make most people satisfied via the free market and a free society in general, there will still be failure and suffering but that is short term. The free market is vasly superior any government allocating resourses corrently 0 1

Not everyone is suitable to live in a free society but the ones ill suited for that will be eliminated from the gene pool and there suffering will come to an end. If you keep the unfit alive by artificial means you will end up with more and more failure and suffering until the entire society fails. The freedom to fail is a very important freedom, nothing good comes from trying to protect people from their own stupidity. If someone wants to kill himself or destroy the brain with drugs, let him to it.

Anarchy
When the power structure collapses the result is often anarchy. In a true anarchy the strong will end up dominating the weak. The brave will dominate the cowards, the intelligent will dominate the lemmings, the physically strong will dominate the physically weak. Anarchy eventually leads to totalitarianism due to human nature, the transformation into totalitarianism will take a long time and the best among our population is likely to end up in the top. One example of a stateless society is medieval iceland which lasted 290 years.

Local leadership
The next logical step from anarchy is local leadership. The local rule can be dictatorial, democratic or libertarian(non aggression principle), the most natural state is one male ruler dominating the populating beneath him. Local leaders can cooperate to defend the country, elect leaders or accomplish a certain mission.

Elite rule
With elite rule only a few people will be permitted the vote. The right to vote can be determined objectively by iq-tests or subjective based on their accomplishments in general(i prefer the latter). The few selected(A-citizens) will be very motivated to vote correctly and also have the intelligence needed to know which experts to listen to for different subjects.

My suggestion is to share the power between A-citizens(prominent citizens) and a senate(15 seats). The number of A-citizens will always be 999, if one dies a new will be chosen by the member of the senate(they take turns in the choosing). The successor for an important position is always chosen by the person having that position, first to forth successor is chosen and the fist successor will be involved in the decision making.

My old more detailed suggestion is http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?t=2483&p=7772
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

There is no such thing as karma

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 15, 2016 3:36 pm

The only way to improve your next life is to improve living condition for Caucasians, reincarnation into a different race is highly unlikely. There will be no judgement after death, a mass murderer will not be worse or better of than an important surgeon.

Of course you can still live a moral life, you live according to your own morals and rules. Absolute morality does not exist, only preferences different people have. Only a few has the opportunity to shape the world according to their preferences. You should focus on making your current life great and honourable, take the chances you get, you will not get the same chances next life.

Some people want anarchy and war while others like stability. Some females like men with large cocks while others dislike if the cock is too big. I personally like the colours black, red and yellow and dislike pink and blue. I prefer the white race over other races and want a future where the Aryans has expanded at the expense of all other races. Depending on your preferences the right thing to do will be different, most people today lacks the intelligence and knowledge to make proper decisions based on their preferences which makes the masses easy to fool.

A lot of cowards want go believe that behind a compliant slave will bring you to heaven(especially Christians) and this is pure wishful thinking, a way to justify cowardice.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Cosmological models compatible with vintologi

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 15, 2016 10:53 pm

The current big bang model was initially promoted by a catholic priest that wanted to unify Christianity with science, this was very successful. The current big bang modell needs "inflation", dark energy(non-zero cosmological constant) and dark matter to work, non of these has been detected or yet explained theoretically in a satisfying way.

Conformal Cyclic Cosmology
This model was developed by Roger Penrose and Vahe Gurzadyan, the idea behind the model is that when the universe gets really big due to exponential expansion it forgets how big it is and a new big bang occurs. This is similar to the current big bang model but does not need inflation.
Image

Big bang big crunch
The gravity will eventually win which result in the universe collapsing into a a single black hole. A big crunch is likely to result in a new big bang. This view of the universe has lost popularity with the observations showing that the expansion rate is accelerating.

Is the universe really expanding?
A large group of scientist is proposing that the redshift is misunderstood, Halton Arp lost his telescope time as a punishment for his alternative redshift explanation and research. The electric universe view that electromagnetism is dominating the universe and not gravity is growing in popularity, electromagnetism could explain why the galaxies far away from the centre of the galaxy is moving too fast and no dark matter will be needed.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

No holy books

PostPosted by datorissten » Sat Jul 16, 2016 8:57 am

All religions change over time, Christianity is completely different now compared to 1000 years ago. The problem with holy books is that they are generally based on revelation(someone making it up or copying texts) and with time the texts end up outdated and no longer relevant.

Vintologi is instead based on a few scientific assumptions that in the future can be proven or disproven. Of course we can write religions books bot these books will not be written in stone, they will be improved with time. Like libertarianism and Austrian economics vintologi is axiomatic; you use logic to arrive at conclusions from a few assumptions. The difference between Vintologi and philosophy in general is that the assumption in Vintologi is scientific in nature and not just a theoretical assumption.

Not a single word i write should be considered holy. Words is only combination of signs that can have many different meanings depending on the context. The words i write is simply a way to describe my interpretation of vintologi based on my current preferences and understanding of the world. Different interpretation of vintologi will suite different types of individuals, vintologi in it's current form is aimed at the genetically superior only.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Master vs slave morality

PostPosted by datorissten » Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:33 pm

If you have a master morality you accept the realities of the world. Master morality creates its own values and stands beyond good and evil; slave morality values kindness, humility, and sympathy. The master transcends the mediocrity of the common person.

This has interesting implications for the relationship between the sexes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhaaVeYmWM4

If you dont accept the realities of the world you will not be able to make decisions that benefit you, instead you will make decisions that benetit the ones manipulating you. Most people currently simply cannot accept obvious realities and prefer to live in a fantasy, this end up harming them.

Currently a lot of people have trouble accepting that there is significant different between humans. Males are disposable while the nature regards females as valuable simply for being able to get pragnant. There is great differences between the races and also the individuals within the different races. Equality and univeral love is a social construct.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Utilizing your body to the fullest potential

PostPosted by datorissten » Thu Jul 21, 2016 7:28 pm

The human body has many amazing features. Each life will provide different capabilities, by training you can learn many skills and havd great experiences even without having any special gifts.

Hardcore sex
Anal sex offers pleasure for both sexes but only a small part of the population engage in it regularly. Many men are afraid of being gay and will hence never experience a powerful orgasm. Males have a prostate which makes them even more suitable for receiving anal sex.

Females can experience double penetration which can be very pleasurable. While anal done wrongly can be painful a lot of woman likes the experience of it despite not having the male prostate. Learning deep throating is a good thing to do as a female, their is nothing wrong in having good sex.

Sex is not just about reproduction, it is also about bondage and pleasure. A good relationship between the man and the females is good for the female and the children, everyone will benefit from great sexual experiences. Good sex is brutal and similar to rape, most females like to get dominated.

Pregnancy, birth and breastfeeding
A lot of females today make the mistake of focusing mostly on career and misses the amazing experience of having a large family. As a male i misses that experience and instead have a provider and protector role or simply donating sperm.

Wars
Males have strong bodies for good reasons. Most people today misses the experience of wars and if we do participate in a war it will usually not benefit them in the upcoming lives. In the future males might be able to fight wars that actually makes their next lives good. Dying in combat is not a bad thing.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Pushing your brain to the limit

PostPosted by datorissten » Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:33 pm

Most people today underestimate what their brains is capable of. By training most people can learn amazing skills.

Videogames
There is some very challenging 2D games. Addams family the pugsley scavanger hunt and umihara kawase two good challanging games for the snes system and can be played by emulator. If your screen is capable of 120fps a good idea is to play the game at twice the speed, this will make it a lot harder and good titles such as donkey kong country 2 will become challenging again.

Board games
board games such as Fischer random(chess 960) and connect6 is suitable for pushing your logical skills. I am currently working on a new board game which is suitable for improving the ability to visualise.

Maths and physics
Regardless of iq you will always come to a point where you no longer understand. I am personally struggle to understand General Relativity and quantum mechanics fully. I would recommend studying at least basic classical physics and university maths. Try solving the equation 0=9x^6-25x^5+81x⁴+42x³+143x²-145x+55

Logical puzzles
Kakuro and slither link is good examples of logical puzzles. The typical Sudoku puzzle you find in newspapers offers no challenge but there is some good soduko and sudokuX puzzles on the internet.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

About false religions

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 22, 2016 5:06 am

Vintologi differs from other religions in how it views other religions. There is currently over 4300 faith groups worshipping false religions. A falsa religion can be both useful and harmful for our cause. Generally religion is regarded as true by the masses, false by the intellectuals and useful by the rulers.

paradise lies
By lying about life after death you will be able to control people, by promising a great afterlife reward to people that die in battle you will get brave soldiers, a lot of muslims blow themselves up since they seriously believe in their paradise fairy tales. You can also scare people into doing what you want by threatening by eternal torture(Hell) or bad karma(hinduism/buddhism).

Christian identity
Christian identity had in the US been a prominent religion for racial loyalty, this false religion can be useful if the goal is to expand the white race at the expense of other races. From http://christogenea.org/articles/what-c ... n-identity

Christian Identity, also sometimes called Israel Identity, is the only true conservative Christianity. It is true because it seeks to maintain the understanding – in accordance with Scripture - that the New Covenant was made only with those same people with whom the Old Covenant was made: the House (family) of Israel and the House (family) of Judah. These Israelite people are traceable through time to the Keltic and Germanic tribes of today. None of these people are Jews.

As more people accept science fewer will accept these unscientific religions and most people will not take them seriously. Christian identity has been successful in the US due to the prominent role Christ insanity has in their society. An intelligent human will not likely believe in christian fairy tales and hence a christian religion will fail to attract the people needed.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

True self ownership

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 22, 2016 6:12 am

We need to view females as sexual objects, not gods. The "romantic love" idea is insanity 1 2 we need polygamy and male domination, not gynocentrism.

I like the concept of self ownership since it would allow the female to sell her own body to a dominant male, my idea is to replace the state(that females like) with individual males allowing the females to personally choice their own masters. The male has the right to demand and force sex, rape itself should not be considered a crime within the marriage. The male should among his wives impregnate the ones with the best genetic material most.

http://bornwithacunt.blogspot.se/

The females will be able to divorce the man, the female will get back the assets she had before the marriage, if the man was the one not fulfilling the responsibilities within the marriage she should get a larger part. Currently marriage is a very bad deal for the males females wants and because of that the marriage rate is currently very low.

The real winners of this system is the females, the losers will be most males. I am not interested in fairness, i am mostly interested in making a system that is liked by powerful males and females in general. The state could offer free castration for the rejected males. One solution is to allow the reverse, female on top controlling several men, as an alternative for the unattractive males, this is acceptable unless the female gets pregnant with one of the males.

Child custody
the master(male) should determine which parent who receives to custody of the child between 2 to 10, after 10 the child will decide and before 2 the mother can demand custody over the child, if she does not do that the master of the relationship decides. There will be no child support or government support to single parents.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Why creativity failed

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:01 am

Creativity is a religion claimed to be natures eternal religion, a religion simply based on the laws of nature. In reality creativity is not based on the laws of nature but mere assumptions. Currently the true laws of nature isn't known and we can currently only make educated guesses.

According to creativity this life is the only life and i simply cannot accept this view. There is no valid reasons to believe that this life is the only life, for be it is obvious that our soul is eternal and this life is only one in and infinite series. There is only evidence for reincarnation, there is no evidence against it.

I do not agree with the 16 commandments of creativity nor should any other statements be considered holy or unfallable. It is too focused on the white race and there is no focus as all on spiritually or higher goals.

A religion should not be based on race survival, a religion should be about happiness and honor. A religion should liberate and not be a burden. Vintologi offers liberation from false morals and the fear of death, our answers is based on actual science and hopefully we will be proven right on the future.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Pantheism

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:04 pm

The idea of pantheism is that everything is good. Vintomogi is like cosmotheism a pantheist religion. Vintologi is more specific; good emerges from quantum mechanics(the collapse of the wavefunction).

Every brain is a part of god, some are a big part of god while other brains(such as the one in insects) only is an infinitesimal part. Most animals wont be able to effect the world in a significant way, there role is limited, some humans may be saved by a dolphin but the dolphin lacks the ability to evaluate the long term consequences of their actions, most humans are also like this.

Unlike cosmotheism vintologi lacks a higher goal or absolute morality, we simply believe in reincarnation governed by the laws of nature. In vintologi it is up to every individual human to shape the world according to their preferences and the basic scientific beliefs we share.

The only way to recreate the true god is via a big bang / big crunch where all matters is part of a single quantum mechanical system. It is true that breeding can make us more god like but if we want to do this is in vintologi only a personal preference, some humans is probably happy with the current level of fitness of the humans in general. I do not consider many humans to currently have an acceptable level of intelligence of fitness in general but this is only a preference of mine.
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

About braindamage and mental disorders

PostPosted by datorissten » Fri Jul 22, 2016 5:32 pm

No brain in perfect. If you are unlucky you end up wiith severe mental disorders. If you are lucky you are just a little bit insane. How much can the brain be changed/damaged with remained consciousness? we does not really know but we know the brain can take a lot of abuse. If a brain gets destroyd and recreated a reincarnation will occur, the likelyhood for reincarnation will decrease if the brain difference is large.

Different regions of the brain has different purposes, your brain will perform well on some tasks and poor at others depending on genetics and training. Spatial and logical intelligence is very imortant for problem solving and most humans have very poor spatial and logical intelligence, only a few has enough to contribute anything of major value to the society.

An iq below 130 is a severe mental disability. Classifying a lot of people as mental disabled is controverial(ADHD is good example of that) and becuase of that the threshold for retardation was set to an iq of 70 instead of 100. Most people simply is too stupid to even notice their own limitations and generally have high self esteem.

Currently mental disorders is defined by symptoms instead of an actual disibility and this is not scientific. The rosenhan experiment had shown without a doubt that psychiatrists cannot tell the sane from the insane, they are just fooling themself.

http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.p ... 71dd0793f3
User avatar
datorissten
Site Admin
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:46 pm

Next

Return to Religion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest